Comparison of the crude oil removal effects of different surfactants in electrokinetic remediation of low-permeability soil
Title
Comparison of the crude oil removal effects of different surfactants in electrokinetic remediation of low-permeability soil
Subject
Crude oil
Surfactant
Soil remediation
EK remediation
Low-permeability soil
Remediation
Petroleum transportation
Leakage (fluid)
Soil pollution
Soils
Sulfur compounds
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
Nonionic surfactants
Micelles
Soil conservation
Electroosmosis
Description
Crude oil leakage during production, transportation and storage has polluted large soil areas. If improperly treated, this could seriously threaten human health. In this study, low-permeability soil was selected as the contaminated target because it has been proven to be hardly treated with common technologies. Spiked soil was treated in an EK cell at 1V/cm for 15 days with different surfactants, including an anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), biosurfactant, rhamnolipid (Rham) and nonionic surfactant, Tween 80. Experimental dependent variables, including current, electroosmotic flow (EOF), gas volume, residual crude oil concentration and components in the restored soil were monitored and analyzed. The results indicated that the produced gas and current followed the sequence of SDS > Rham > Tween 80, but the overall efficiency of the surfactants regarding crude oil removal from soil followed the order of Tween 80 > Rham > SDS, corresponding to 18.05%, 14.06%, and 9.35%, respectively, agreeing with the EOF sequence. It is proposed that the EOF is closely related to pollutant removal, and the relatively low SDS and Rham removal levels were mainly related to the electromigration/electrophoresis reduction in micelles. Furthermore, experimental result analysis revealed that the light oil phase proportion in the surfactant-treated samples decreased, while the heavy component proportion increased, regardless of the surfactant type. Hence, surfactant-enhanced EK remediation may be unsuitable for low-permeability soil with a high heavy oil proportion, which may be a notable limitation of this technology.
Publisher
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Date
2021
2021-02-11
Contributor
Li, Yunlong
Jiang, Liguo
Type
journalArticle
Identifier
2213-3437
10.1016/j.jece.2021.105190
URL
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343721001676
Collection
Citation
“Comparison of the crude oil removal effects of different surfactants in electrokinetic remediation of low-permeability soil,” Lamar University Midstream Center Research, accessed May 18, 2024, https://lumc.omeka.net/items/show/17223.